Speech Free Samples Abortion Should be Legal Every day, the media run a story of a child, or a woman for that matter, who has been raped either by people known to them or by strangers. Thus, legalizing abortion will solve cases of unwanted pregnancies arising from such cases and complications during pregnancies. Some of these cases lead to transmission of STIs and pregnancy. When a pregnancy occurs due to rape, the victim is not to blame, the perpetrator is.
Interesting Cleveland Plain-Dealer story: Lawyer Dean Boland has testified as a defense expert in three child-pornography cases in Northeast Ohio. Charges were thrown out in two of the. Boland, 37, of Lakewood, is one of a handful Persuasive speech abortion legal criminal-defense experts in the country with the knowledge to testify about digital-imaging technology and the ways pornographers are using it to enhance and distribute their wares via the Internet.
Boland has teamed with criminal defense lawyers who are exploiting a provision of [child pornography] law that says to obtain a conviction, a prosecutor must prove that a digital portrait of suspected child pornography is, in fact, a picture of a child.
To meet that requirement, the image must be authenticated as a child and not an adult digitally enhanced to look like a child -- an extremely difficult level of proof for police and prosecutors, Boland says. Without the evidence to refute Boland's testimony and prove authenticity, judges threw out child-pornography charges in Summit and Portage counties in March.
A Columbiana County judge has reserved his ruling until trial. Recall that in Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition, the government argued that non-obscene virtual child pornography -- i. The Court rejected that argument: Finally, the Government says that the possibility of producing images by using computer imaging makes it very difficult for it to prosecute those who produce pornography by using real children.
Experts, we are told, may have difficulty in saying whether the pictures were made by using real children or by using computer imaging.
The necessary solution, the argument runs, is to prohibit both kinds of images. The argument, in essence, is that protected speech may be banned as a means to ban unprotected speech. This analysis turns the First Amendment upside down.
The Government may not suppress lawful speech as the means to suppress unlawful speech. Protected speech does not become unprotected merely because it resembles the latter. The Constitution requires the reverse. Justice Thomas concurred in the judgment though his vote wasn't needed to form the Court's majority ; he reasoned: In my view, the Government's most persuasive asserted interest in support of the [CPPA] is the prosecution rationale -- that persons who possess and disseminate pornographic images of real children may escape conviction by claiming that the images are computer generated, thereby raising a reasonable doubt as to their guilt.
At this time, however, the Government asserts only that defendants raise such defenses, not that they have done so successfully. In fact, the Government points to no case in which a defendant has been acquitted based on a "computer generated images" defense.
While this speculative interest cannot support the broad reach of the CPPA, technology may evolve to the point where it becomes impossible to enforce actual child pornography laws because the Government cannot prove that certain pornographic images are of real children.
In the event this occurs, the Government should not be foreclosed from enacting a regulation of virtual child pornography that contains an appropriate affirmative defense or some other narrowly drawn restriction. The Court suggests that the Government's interest in enforcing prohibitions against real child pornography cannot justify prohibitions on virtual child pornography, because "[t]his analysis turns the First Amendment upside down.
Will cases such as the ones described in the Plain Dealer article -- assuming that they indeed reflect serious obstacles to prosecution of real child pornography, and not just easily remediable errors on the government's part -- persuade Justice Thomas, and perhaps even one of the Justices in the Free Speech Coalition majority say, Justice Breyer?
Thanks to reader John Waszak for the pointer to the newspaper article. Levy, July 2, at Bush's conspiring to get Osama bin Laden's relatives out of the U.
If the decision not to attack was made by the NSC, then there's a pretty small number of people who can credibly claim to know why it was made.
The CIA source might be telling the truth as far as he or she knows, but not be in a position to know very well.
One item from the column I hadn't seen before: John Abizaid about it.Free persuasive papers, essays, and research papers. Persuasive Speech: Everyone Should Use a Seat Belt While in a Car - TOPIC Why we should use seatbelt when driving a car SPECIFIC PERPOSE To persuade my audience to use the seat belt in car.
A persuasive speech is a speech written and delivered to convince people of the speaker’s viewpoint. It uses words to make the audience ‘see’ the speaker’s point . Persuasive Speech Outline on Abortion. Introduction.
I am against abortion being legal because abortion has received considerable attention, and its legality and availability have often generated controversy. 1. More people are starting to believe it should be legal. Persuasive Speech on Abortion: what you have to mention.
Writing a speech on a controversial subject is always difficult to do. Abortion is one of . Abortion has become morally acceptable to some simply because it is currently legal. Legality does not necessarily imply morality. Slavery was once legal in the United States, even though it clearly was not moral.
You are correct.
I am using a reworded form of the SLED test. I was trained by Scott Klusendorf 13 years ago and I generally recommend his material. Scott is a theist but he nevertheless can make a strong secular case against abortion that has served as fuel to my own.
Persuasive Speech: Abortion Ends Innocent Human Life Essay; Persuasive Speech: Abortion Ends Innocent Human Life Essay. Words 4 Pages. Specific Purpose: To persuade the audience to chose life Abortion is when a mother decides to terminate her pregnancy. Persuasive Speech Outline (Using Monroe’s Motivated Sequence) . A comprehensive, coeducational Catholic High school Diocese of Wollongong - Albion Park Act Justly, love tenderly and walk humbly with your God Micah This page is a collection of over persuasive speech topic ideas for college students. Use this list as a last resort: you are much more likely to be successful when you choose a topic that genuinely interests you, rather than merely picking one from a list.